Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Dena Bank

Digitallysigned byTRUSHATRUSHATUSHARTUSHARMOHITEMOHITEDate:2023.07.2417:38:21+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1192 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2 ….. Appellant Vs. Dena Bank ….. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani a/w Ms.Arati Vissanji /b Mr.Sudhir Mehta for respondent WITHINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1683 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2 ….. Appellant Vs. Central Bank of India ….. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr.Tejas Shah for respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1891 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2 ….. Appellant Vs. Bank of India ….. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr.Atul K. Jasani for respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2040 OF 2019 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2 ….. Appellant Vs. Bank of India ….. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr.Subhash Shetty for respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.676 OF 2020 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-2 ….. Appellant Vs. Bank of India ….. Respondent Mr.Suresh Kumar for the appellant Mr.Subhash Shetty for respondent CORAM:K.R. SHRIRAM, J &FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J. DATED : 21[st] JULY 2023 P.C. .Mr.Suresh Kumar in fairness states that questions of law as framed in these five Appeals are squarely covered by a judgment of this Court inCommissioner of Income Tax-LTU v/s. Union Bank of India[1]. 2.Mr.Suresh Kumar states that number of identical matters have alsobeen disposed subsequently relying on this judgment. 3.In these circumstances, five Appeals mentioned above are disposed. (FIRDOSH P.POONIWALLA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) 1[2019] 105 taxmann.com 253 (Bombay)