Case Law › High Court › Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-32,Mumbai...

Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-32,Mumbai 32 v. Sanjay Dhokad, Hi Rock Construction Co

High Court 05 Jul 2023 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

05 Jul 2023

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-32,Mumbai 32 v. Sanjay Dhokad, Hi Rock Construction Co, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.In the circumstances, Appeal also stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

Digitallysigned byTRUSHATRUSHATUSHARTUSHARMOHITEMOHITEDate:2023.07.1110:25:40+0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.438 OF 2018 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-32,Mumbai 32 ….. Appellant Vs. Sanjay Dhokad, Hi Rock Construction Co. ….. Respondent Ms.Swapna Gokhale for the appellant Ms.Simoni Chouhan for the Respondent CORAM:K.R. SHRIRAM, J &FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J.DATED :5TH JULY 2023 P.C. 1.Ms.Gokhale states that regarding the same respondent,another Appeal being Income Tax Appeal No.795 of 2018 had beenfiled for Assessment Year 2010-11, (the present Appeal is forAssessment Year 2009-10) and that appeal was dismissed. And theorder passed therein would consequently apply here also. 2.In the circumstances, Appeal also stands dismissed. (FIRDOSH P.POONIWALLA, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.