Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-3,Ahmedabad v. Madhav Corporation

C/TAXAP/25/2016 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 25 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 143 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 164 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 257 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 294 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 334 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 359 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 363 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 46 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 477 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 68 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 814 of 2016With R/TAX APPEAL NO. 815 of 2016 ========================================================== PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3,AHMEDABADVersusMADHAV CORPORATION ========================================================== Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1MR SN DIVATIA(1378) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM:HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA4[th] September 2018andHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA4[th] September 2018 ORAL ORDER(PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Learned advocate Ms. Mauna Bhatt, under instructions from the Department, sought permission to withdraw these appeals since the tax effect involved in these appeals is below the minimum threshold limit provided by the CBDT in its Circular dated 11.07.2018 enabling the Department to prefer and maintain appeals before the High Court. Permission is granted. Tax Appeals are disposed of accordingly. Prakash [Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]