Case LawHigh Court › Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Harpr...

Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Harpreet Singh

High Court 18 Aug 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Harpreet Singh
Date of order
18 Aug 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. Harpreet Singh, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI 85 + ITA 689/2017 PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-7 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Zoheb Hussain, Senior standing counsel. versus HARPREET SINGH ..... Respondent CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH % O R D E R18.08.2017 1. This appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is directed against the impugned order dated 27[th] January 2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 6132/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2008-09. 2. By the impugned order, the ITAT held on facts that the explanation offered by the Assessee is bonafide and that the mistake was inadvertent. It accordingly deleted the penalty levied under Section 271 (1) (c) of the Act. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the Appellant and having perused the impugned order of the ITAT, the Court is not persuaded to hold that any ITA 689/2017 Page 1 of 2 substantial question of law arises in this appeal. The appeal is accordingly dismissed. S.MURALIDHAR, J. AUGUST 18, 2017 Rm PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J. ITA 689/2017 Page 2 of 2
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan