Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax v. Alcatel Lucent India Ltd
High Court
22 Nov 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax v. Alcatel Lucent India Ltd
Date of order
22 Nov 2019
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pr.commissioner Of Income Tax v. Alcatel Lucent India Ltd, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~6.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 21/2019
PR.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
..... Appellant
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Ms. Zehra Khan & Ms. Mehak Sachdeva, Advocates.
versus
ALCATEL LUCENT INDIA LTD
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Himanshu Sinha & Mr. Bhuwan Dhoopar, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R% 22.11.2019
C.M. No. 1645/2019
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and the delay is condoned.
The application stands disposed of.
ITA 21/2019
The Revenue has preferred the present appeal to assail the order dated 06.04.2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi Benches: I-–1, New Delhi in ITA No. 2209/Del/2014 preferred by the assessee, relevant for the Assessment Year 2008-09. Along with the said appeal, ITA –No.2514/Del/2014 preferred by the Revenue, relevant for the Assessment Year 2008-09 had also been decided.
The Revenue had preferred ITA 1277/2018 before this Court from the same impugned order in ITA 2154/Del/2014, which has been rejected by this Court on 06.08.2019 holding that Alphageo India Pvt. Ltd. is engaged in seismic surveys, whereas the assessee is engaged in the manufacture, distribution, sale of digital switching and telecommunication equipments, and that for the Assessment Year in question, the segment was only for installation of such equipments. Even on the basis of functional dissimilarities, the exclusion of Alphageo India Pvt. Ltd. from the comparables was called for.
In view of the aforesaid, no question of law arises in the present appeal. The same is, accordingly, dismissed.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
NOVEMBER 22, 2019 B.S.Rohella
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.