Case LawHigh Court › Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantt...

Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantthroughmr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv v. M/S Business India Telivisioninternational Ltd

High Court 30 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantthroughmr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv v. M/S Business India Telivisioninternational Ltd
Date of order
30 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantthroughmr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv v. M/S Business India Telivisioninternational Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$-54 and 55 *IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +ITA 798/2018 and CMNos.30084-30085/2018 PR.COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX-2AppellantThroughMr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv. Versus M/S BUSINESS INDIA TELIVISIONINTERNATIONAL LTD Through And Respondent +ITA 799/2018 and CM Nos.30086-30087/2018 PR.COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX...„ AppellantThroughMr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv. Versus M/S BUSINESS INDIA TELIVISIONINTERNATIONALLTD. Through Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHARORDER%30.07.2018 Counsel for the appellant/Revenue states that the total tax effectin thesetwo appealsis less thanRs.50lakhsand therefore,substantialquestionof law raisedin theseappealsneed not be answeredin termsof circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018. In view of the statementmade, appealsare disposedof without answeringthe substantialquestionoflawwhichis leftopen. In these circumstances, we are not issuing notice in the'applicationforcondonationof delay. SANJIV KHANNA, J JULY 30,2018 b chandW SHEKHAR,J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan