Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantthroughmr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv v. M/S Business India Telivisioninternational Ltd
High Court
30 Jul 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantthroughmr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv v. M/S Business India Telivisioninternational Ltd
Date of order
30 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Pr.commissionerof Income Tax-2Appellantthroughmr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv v. M/S Business India Telivisioninternational Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$-54 and 55
*IN THE HIGH COURTOF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ITA 798/2018 and CMNos.30084-30085/2018
PR.COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX-2AppellantThroughMr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv.
Versus
M/S BUSINESS INDIA TELIVISIONINTERNATIONAL LTD
Through
And
Respondent
+ITA 799/2018 and CM Nos.30086-30087/2018
PR.COMMISSIONEROF INCOME TAX...„ AppellantThroughMr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Adv.
Versus
M/S BUSINESS INDIA TELIVISIONINTERNATIONALLTD.
Through
Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHARORDER%30.07.2018
Counsel for the appellant/Revenue states that the total tax effectin thesetwo appealsis less thanRs.50lakhsand therefore,substantialquestionof law raisedin theseappealsneed not be answeredin termsof circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018.
In view of the statementmade, appealsare disposedof without
answeringthe substantialquestionoflawwhichis leftopen.
In these circumstances, we are not issuing notice in the'applicationforcondonationof delay.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
JULY 30,2018
b
chandW SHEKHAR,J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.