Case LawHigh Court › Precot Meridian Ltd.,"Supreme" P.b v. Ch...

Precot Meridian Ltd.,"Supreme" P.b v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018

High Court 28 Mar 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Precot Meridian Ltd.,"Supreme" P.b v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018
Date of order
28 Mar 2023
Assessment year(s)
1994-95, 2006-07
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Precot Meridian Ltd.,"Supreme" P.b v. Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 28.03.2023 CORAM THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH W.P. No.18411 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 of 2013 & 1 of 2015 Precot Meridian Ltd.,"Supreme" P.B.No.7161,737, Green Fields, Puliakulam Road,Coimbatore - 45Represented by its Managing DirectorAshwin Chandran .... Petitioner Vs. 1.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018 ...Respondents Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records and quash the order passed in C.No.1433(9-12)/CCIT/CBE/12-13 by the first respondent, under Section W.P. No.18411 of 2013 119(2)(a) RWS 234B and 234C dated 06/06/2013 in so far as AY 1994-95, 1995-96, 1997-98 and 2005-06 are concerned as contrary to law and suffer from the error of Jurisdiction and direct the First Respondent to reconsider the applications for waiver of the interest levied under section 234 B and 234C of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 1994-95, 1995-96, 1997-98 and 2005-06 in line with the Board Circular in F.No.400/129/2002-IT(B) dated 26/06/2006 by extending the benefit granted for the Assessment Year 2006-07. For Petitioner: Mr.A.S.SriramanFor Respondents: Mr.R.S.Balaji Standing Counsel O R D E R An endorsement has made by Mr.A.S.Sriraman, learned counsel for the petitioner to the effect that the present writ petition is rendered infructuous as the demand of tax has been settled under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme. 2. Recording the same, this writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Connected miscellaneous petitions are also dismissed. vsIndex: Yes/NoSpeaking orderNeutral citation:Yes/No 28.03.2023 To 1.Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018 Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018 2.Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018 Race Course Road, Coimbatore - 641 018 4 W.P. No.18411 of 2013 Dr.ANITA SUMANTH, J. vs W.P.No.18411 of 2013 andM.P.Nos.1 of 2013 & 1 of 2015 28.03.2023
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan