Case LawHigh Court › Prem Lal Jain v. M .C. Katheria , Direct...

Prem Lal Jain v. M .C. Katheria , Director Gen Of Income Tax (Investigation

High Court 02 Aug 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Prem Lal Jain v. M .C. Katheria , Director Gen Of Income Tax (Investigation
Date of order
02 Aug 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Prem Lal Jain v. M .C. Katheria , Director Gen Of Income Tax (Investigation, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Issue: It is not known whether by this time the direction in the order dated 7[th] December, 2010 in writ petition No.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

OD-20 ORDER SHEET CC/139/2013 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (CONTEMPT) ORIGINAL SIDE PREM LAL JAIN VS M .C. KATHERIA , DIRECTOR GEN OF INCOME TAX (INVESTIGATION) BEFORE: The Hon'ble JUSTICE ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE Date: 2[nd] August, 2022. The Court: This contempt application filed under Article 215 of the Constitution of India read with the provisions of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 is listed today for consideration. On call none appears for the petitioner. Perused the order dated 3[rd] June, 2014. It appears that liberty was granted to contemnor No. 2 to comply the order passed in the writ application expeditiously. The matter is appearing after more than seven years. It is not known whether by this time the direction in the order dated 7[th] December, 2010 in writ petition No. 1709 of 2005 has been complied or not. Due to absence of the petitioner, the contempt application being CC No. 139 of 2013 stands dismissed for default. (ANANDA KUMAR MUKHERJEE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan