Prem Shaji Raghavan v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
16 Sep 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Prem Shaji Raghavan v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
16 Sep 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Prem Shaji Raghavan v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Decision: In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition and pending application are disposed of as having become infructuous.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~6
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P. (C) 6397/2020 & CM APPL. 22588/2020
PREM SHAJI RAGHAVAN ...... Petitioner Through: Mr. Abraham C. Mathews, Advocate.
versus
INCOME TAX OFFICER ...... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Advocate.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R16.09.2020
The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing.
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that after the last date of hearing, the petitioner’s pension bank account No. 67042175781 of State Bank of India, Nediavila Branch (Kollam District, Kerala) has been de-freezed by the Commissioner, Income Tax in an appeal filed by the petitioner.
In view of the aforesaid, the present writ petition and pending application are disposed of as having become infructuous.
The order be uploaded on the website forthwith. Copy of the order be also forwarded to the learned counsel through e-mail.
MANMOHAN, J
SEPTEMBER 16, 2020 KA
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue