Pricipal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Avaya India Pvt. Ltd, Through: None
High Court
16 May 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Pricipal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Avaya India Pvt. Ltd, Through: None
Date of order
16 May 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Pricipal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Avaya India Pvt. Ltd, Through: None, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
7
+ ITA 838/2016
PRICIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1..... Appellant Through:Mr Sanjay Kumar and Mr Dileep Shivpuri, Advocates
versus
AVAYA INDIA PVT. LTD, Through: None
..... Respondent
CORAM:JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
%
O R D E R16.05.2017
1. The Revenue has filed this appeal under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 17[th] June, 2016 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 146/Del/2013 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2008-09.
2. The question urged before this Court concerns the exclusion of one comparable in determining the arm's length price of the international transaction involving the Assessee for the AY under consideration in the software development segment and ITE service segment.
3. Having heard the learned counsel for the Revenue, and having carefully
ITA 838/2016
examined the impugned order of the ITAT in light of Rule 10B(4) of the Income Tax Rules, 1962 the Court is unable to be persuaded that the exclusion of the comparables for the reasons set out in the impugned order of the ITAT gives rise to any substantial question of law.
4. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.
S.MURALIDHAR, J
MAY 16, 2017 rd
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.