Case Law › High Court › Primarc Pecan Retail Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy...

Primarc Pecan Retail Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 1(4), Kolkata & Ors

High Court 10 Aug 2023 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_appellate_side

Parties

Date of order

10 Aug 2023

Assessment year(s)

2016-17

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Primarc Pecan Retail Pvt. Ltd v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 1(4), Kolkata & Ors, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

10.08.2023PBSl. No.21. WPA 18836 of 2023 Primarc Pecan Retail Pvt. Ltd. VsDeputy Commissioner of IncomeTax Central Circle 1(4), Kolkata & Ors. Mr. Samrat Das,Mr. Suman Bhowmik. … For the Petitioner.Mrs. Smita Das De.…..for the respondents. Heard learned advocates appearing for theparties. By this writ petition, petitioner has made a veryinnocuous prayer for direction upon the CIT (Appeals) – 20 concerned to consider and dispose of the pendingappeal in question which has been filed on 25[th] April,2022 as appears from page 36 of the writ petition forthe assessment year 2016-17. Considering the facts and circumstances of thiscase, this writ petition being WPA 18836 of 2023 isdisposed of by directing the respondent CIT (Appeals) –20 concerned to consider and dispose of the pendingappeal in question filed by the petitioner expeditiouslyand preferably within six months from the date ofcommunication of this order. ( Md. Nizamuddin, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.