Case LawHigh Court › Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income T...

Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Odisha & Others v. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate

High Court 16 Nov 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · cisnc
Parties
Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Odisha & Others v. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate
Date of order
16 Nov 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Principal Chief Commissioner Of Income Tax, Odisha & Others v. Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate, the High Court (2023) decided the matter.

Decision: With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.37288 of 2023 M/s. Shark Mines & Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Odisha & others ….. Vs. ….. Petitioner Mr. Kedar Nath Tripathy, Advocate Opposite Parties Mr. Sidharth Sankar Mohapatra, Sr. Standing Counsel (Income Tax) CORAM: ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DR. B.R. SARANGI MR. JUSTICE MURAHARI SRI RAMAN ORDER 16.11.2023 Order No. 01. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Since the impugned assessment order under Annexure-16 is appealable one, this Court is not inclined to entertain this writ petition. However, liberty is granted to the petitioner to pursue its remedy before the appropriate forum in accordance with law. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, this writ petition is disposed of. MRS Signature Not Verified Digitally SignedSigned by: MANORANJAN SAMALDesignation: PERSONAL ASSISTANTReason: AuthenticationLocation: Orissa High Court, CuttackDate: 17-Nov-2023 12:23:27 (DR. B.R. SARANGI) ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE (M.S. RAMAN) JUDGE
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan