Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commission Of Income Tax Deptt...

Principal Commission Of Income Tax Deptt v. M/S Trubmoo Cements

High Court 26 Apr 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · kashmirhc
Parties
Principal Commission Of Income Tax Deptt v. M/S Trubmoo Cements
Date of order
26 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commission Of Income Tax Deptt v. M/S Trubmoo Cements, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Accordingly, the appeal shall stand dismissed as withdrawn along with all connected MPs.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JAMMU AND KASHMIR AT SRINAGAR CONC-38/18 Date of Order : 26.04.2019 Principal Commission of Income tax deptt. v. M/S Trubmoo cements Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey, JudgeHon’ble Mr. Justice Tashi Rabstan, Judge Appearing Counsel: For the petitioners: Mr. J.A Kawoosa, AdvFor the respondents: Mr. Javid Iqbal, adv CONC no. 38/18 For the reasons mentioned coupled with the submissions made at bar delay of 26 days in filing the Income Tax Appeal is condoned. Condonation delay application is disposed of. ITA No. 01/19. Mr. J. A Kawoosa, learned counsel for the appellant submits that Income tax department has sent him a photo copies of communication no. ACIT/Sgr/2018-19 dated 25.04.2019 and Circular No. 3/2018 in terms whereof the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax has requested the learned counsel to withdraw the appeal in light of the CBDT Circular No. 03 dated 11.07.2018 regarding revision of Monetary Limits for appeals and in light of the communication from the office of Principal Commissioner F.No.PrCIT/JMU/Judl/2019-10/582-584 dated 24.03.2019, whereby revised monetary limit from Rs. 20 lacs to Rs.50 lacs is now for filing appeal before the High Courts. In the present case the Tax effected is only having limit of Rs.23,79, 75/-. In view of the policy decision of the Central Board of Direct Taxes reflected in the Circular no. 03/2018, dated 11.07.2018, the appellant is seeking withdrawal of the present appeal. His statement is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal shall stand dismissed as withdrawn along with all connected MPs. Interim direction, if any, subsisting shall stand vacated. (Tashi Rabstan ) (Justice Ali Mohammad Magrey) Judge Judge Srinagar 26.04.19. Ayaz
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan