Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-02...

Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-02 v. Centre For Vocational & Entrepreneurshipstudies

High Court 31 Jul 2017 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

31 Jul 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income-Tax-02 v. Centre For Vocational & Entrepreneurshipstudies, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~ 10 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI +ITA No. 273/2016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX-02, ..... AppellantThrough:Mr. Sanjay Kumaar with Mr. RahulChaudhary, Advocates. versus CENTRE FOR VOCATIONAL & ENTREPRENEURSHIPSTUDIES ..... Respondent Through:None. CORAM:JUSTICE S. MURALIDHARJUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH O R D E R%31.07.2017 1. No process fee was filed pursuant to the order dated 10[th]April, 2017.Today, learned counsel for the Revenue states that the address given in theappeal is the correct address, notwithstanding that the notices issued at thesaid address have been returned unserved earlier with the remarks “doorfound locked”. His instructions are that the Revenue will be able to serve theRespondent dasti if one more opportunity is given. 2. Given the long history of this case, when it has already taken more thanone year to serve the Respondent, it would be appropriate if the appeal isdismissed with liberty to Revenue to revive the appeal after the Revenue issure about the correct present address of the Respondent. Ordered accordingly. JULY 31, 2017srb S.MURALIDHAR, J. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, J.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.