Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v....

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Jewellers, 1756, Telipara, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur

High Court 25 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

25 Oct 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Jewellers, 1756, Telipara, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 2.In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 78/2024 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Income TaxDepartment, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DassRoad, Statue Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Appellant Versus M/s Royal Jewellers, 1756, Telipara, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr.Anuroop Singhi with Mr.Aditya Khandelwal For Respondent(s): HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/10/2024 1.Learned counsel for the appellant does not want to press thisappeal as the same is covered by the Circular No.09/2024 dated17[th] September, 2024. 2.In view of the above, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed. 3.Stay application and/or any other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J Preeti Asopa /19

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.