Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v....

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Jewellers, 1756, Telipara, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur

High Court 16 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · jaipur

Parties

Date of order

16 Oct 2024

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S Royal Jewellers, 1756, Telipara, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Income Tax Appeal is accordingly, dismissed aswithdrawn.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Income Tax Appeal No. 77/2024 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Income TaxDepartment, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan DassRoad, Statue Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Appellant Versus M/s Royal Jewellers, 1756, Telipara, Chaura Rasta, Jaipur ----Respondent For Appellant(s) : Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Adv.withMr. Aditya Khandelwal, Mr.N.S. Bhati HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 16/10/2024 Counsel for the appellant wants to withdraw thepresent appeal in light of the Circular No.09/2024, dated17.09.2024. D.B. Income Tax Appeal is accordingly, dismissed aswithdrawn. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J (PANKAJ BHANDARI),J CHANDAN /29

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.