Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 Kolkata v. M/S Maithan Steel And Power Ltd
High Court
18 Sep 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 Kolkata v. M/S Maithan Steel And Power Ltd
Date of order
18 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 Kolkata v. M/S Maithan Steel And Power Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
od-7
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/229/2024
IA NO: GA/1/2024, GA/2/2024
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 KOLKATA VS
M/S MAITHAN STEEL AND POWER LTD.
BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : September 18, 2024.
Appearance :Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Mr. Ankan Das, Adv. …for appellant. Mr. J.P. Khaitan, Sr. Adv. Mr. P. Jhunjhunwala, Adv. Ms. Sretapa Sinha, Adv. Ms. Sruti Datta, Adv. …for respondent
The Court :- We have heard learned advocates on either side. It appears that there is a delay of 1511 days in filing the appeal.
The impugned order passed by the learned Tribunal on 26.02.2020, which was received by the department on 16.05.2020. However, the Memorandum of Appeal was presented before this Court on 02.09.2020 and in that process there is a delay of 1631 days.
We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay application and we find that absolutely there is no acceptable explanation for inordinate delay.
Therefore, we are not persuaded to exercise any discretion in favour of the department.
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is dismissed and the application stands rejected.
Substantial question of law suggested is left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE
pkd/GH
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.