Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Ratnagiri Commercial Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata
High Court
05 Jun 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Ratnagiri Commercial Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata
Date of order
05 Jun 2023
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Kolkata v. M/S. Ratnagiri Commercial Pvt. Ltd., Kolkata, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, the applicationfor condonation of delay is dismissed and the appeal stands rejected.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
OD–21
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT/109/2023IA No:GA/1/2023, GA/2/2023
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1, KOLKATAVS.M/S. RATNAGIRI COMMERCIAL PVT. LTD., KOLKATA
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 5[th] June, 2023
Appearance :Ms. Smita Das De, Adv.… for appellant
Mr. S.M. Surana, Sr. Adv.Mr. Bhaskar Sengupta, Adv.… for respondent
The Court : We have heard learned Advocates for the parties.
There is a delay of 1192 days in filing the appeal. We have perused theaffidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition as well as the affidavit-in-opposition. Though prayer has been made for filing an affidavit-in-reply, suchrequest stands rejected.
On perusal of the affidavit filed in support of the condone delayapplication, we find absolutely no explanation for the delay of more than oneand half years. The explanation sought to be offered for the remaining period is
also very sketchy and for that department says that the file had to move fromone table to another.
Since we are not satisfied with the so-called explanation, we reject theprayer for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. Accordingly, the applicationfor condonation of delay is dismissed and the appeal stands rejected.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM)
CHIEF JUSTICE
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
SN.AR(CR)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.