Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Ludhiana v. M/S Trident Limited, Ludhiana
High Court
28 Aug 2019 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Ludhiana v. M/S Trident Limited, Ludhiana
Date of order
28 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1, Ludhiana v. M/S Trident Limited, Ludhiana, the High Court (2019) decided the matter.
Decision: The present appeal is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.3.2019 passed in ITA-444-2018.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
ITA No. 186 of 2019 (O&M)Date of Decision: 28.8.2019
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Ludhiana
.......Appellant
Vs.
M/s Trident Limited, Ludhiana
.......Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY TEWARIHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARNARESH SINGH GILL
Present:Ms. Pridhi Jaswinder Sandhu, Advocate for Mr. Rajesh Katoch, Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant. *****
AJAY TEWARI, J. (ORAL)
At the outset, learned counsel appearing for the appellant-revenue has fairly admitted that the similar issue has been decided by this Court vide judgment dated 26.3.2019 passed in ITA-444-2018 titled 'Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Chandigarh versus M/s Trident Limited, Ludhiana' against the revenue and this appeal may be disposed of in the same terms.
The present appeal is disposed of in terms of judgment dated 26.3.2019 passed in ITA-444-2018.
(AJAY TEWARI) JUDGE
August 28, 2019Gurpreet
GURPREET SINGH2019.08.29 15:24Whether speaking /reasoned : YesI attest to the accuracy andauthenticity of this documentWhether Reportable : Nochandigarh
(HARNARESH SINGH GILL) JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.