In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 Pune v. Jyoti Sahkari Patsanstha Maryadit Kopargaon, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: 2.The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
( 1 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYBENCH AT AURANGABAD
901 INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 51 OF 2024
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1 PUNEVERSUS
JYOTI SAHKARI PATSANSTHA MARYADIT KOPARGAON
…..
Advocate for Appellant : Mrs. Bharaswadkar Patil Kalpalata…..
CORAM : MANISH PITALE &Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, JJ.DATE :18[th] July, 2025
P.C. :-
1.The learned counsel appearing for the Appellant (Revenue)has written instructions to withdraw this appeal as the tax incidence is lessthan Rupees Two Crores. The copy of the written instructions is taken onrecord.
2.The appeal is disposed of as withdrawn. Pending applications,if any, also stand disposed of.
3.Court fee shall be refunded as per rules.
[Y.G. KHOBRAGADE, J.]
[MANISH PITALE, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.