Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Akash Oil Field Service (P) Ltd
High Court
16 Apr 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Akash Oil Field Service (P) Ltd
Date of order
16 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-1 v. Akash Oil Field Service (P) Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench dated 23[rd] August 2017 raising following question for our consideration :- “Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of excess depr...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 352 of 2018
=============================================================PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1VersusAKASH OIL FIELD SERVICE (P) LTD
=============================================================
Appearance :Mrs MAUNA M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1
=============================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA16[th] April 2018andHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA16[th] April 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad Bench dated 23[rd] August 2017 raising following question for our consideration :-
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of excess depreciation claimed on truck and truck mounted equipments of Rs. 64,06,050/= despite the fact that no income was shown on account of hiring in profit and loss account ?”
Fact on record would suggest that the assessee had claimed higher depreciation @ 30% on trucks and truck mounted equipments on the ground that the same were given on hire. The Assessing Officer, however, disallowed such higher depreciation
holding that the assessee had used the equipments for its own purpose. CIT [A] and the Tribunal, however, reversed the order of Assessing Officer. On the basis of documents produced by the assessee, it was held that the assessee was engaged in the business of providing oil field related equipments and that the assessee had given vehicles on hire to the various parties, such as ONGC, GSPCL for which work orders were also issued.
No question of law arises. Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Prakash
[Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.