Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd
High Court
05 Dec 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd
Date of order
05 Dec 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 1 v. Ansal Housing & Construction Ltd, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Therefore, no substantial question of law arises; the appeals are dismissed, accordingly, along with all the pending applications.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
$~24, 25, & 32
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 1103/2017, CM APPL.44151/2017 ITA 1104/2017
ITA 1111/2017, CM APPL.44159/2017
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 1 ..... Appellant Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate.
versus
ANSAL HOUSING & CONSTRUCTION LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Gaurav Jain with Mr. Aniket D. Agrawal, Advocates.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA
%
O R D E R
05.12.2017
The questions of law urged in these batch of appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are with respect to disallowance made for development and construction of housing projects prior to 1.10.1998 and secondly disallowance on the ground of housing units constructed with the built up area of more than 1000 sq.ft. The Assessing Officer held that these were ineligible for benefit under Section 80 IB (10).
We notice that this issue is no longer res integra; in the assessee’s case for assessment years 2000-01 and 2001-02, the revenue had lost its appeals (ITA 480 & 485/2010 and 437/2011,
decided on 24.09.2012). Therefore, no substantial question of law arises; the appeals are dismissed, accordingly, along with all the pending applications.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
DECEMBER 05, 2017 /vikas/
SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue