Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. M/S Blackmelon Advance Technology Company Pvt. Ltd
High Court
16 May 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. M/S Blackmelon Advance Technology Company Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
16 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1 v. M/S Blackmelon Advance Technology Company Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~97
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ITA 292/2024
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 1
..... Appellant Through: Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Sr.SC with Mr. Akshat Singh, Jr.SC along with Ms. Ritika Vohra, Mr. Utkarsh Kandpal, Advs.
Versus
M/S BLACKMELON ADVANCE TECHNOLOGY COMPANY PVT. LTD.
..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
%
O R D E R16.05.2024
CM APPL. 29287/2024 (11 Days Delay ) & CM APPL. 29288/2024 (86 Days Delay in Refiling)
1.Bearing in the mind the disclosures made, the delay of 11 days in filing the appeal and the delay of 86 days in re-filing the appeal is condoned.
2.The applications shall stand disposed of.
ITA 292/2024
3.Bearing in mind the undisputed position of the appeal failing to meet the threshold as provided in Central Board of Direct Taxes Circular No.17/2019, we find no ground to entertain the instant
appeal. The same shall stand dismissed on that score.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
MAY 16, 2024/p
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.