In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-16 v. O R D E R11.03.2024, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 2.In view of the aforesaid and following the view taken in that appeal, the present appeal shall stand dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~28
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 570/2019
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-16
..... Appellant
Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar, Sr.SC for Mr.Abhishek Maratha, Sr.SC.
versus
SMT. NEELAM MALHOTRA LEGAL HEIR OF SH. NAVEEN KUMAR MALHOTRA
..... Respondent Through: Mr.S. Krishnan and Mr.Harshit Chouhan, Advs.
%
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
O R D E R11.03.2024
1.Having heard learned counsels for parties we find that the issues raised in this appeal would be governed by the judgment rendered today in ITA 568/2019.
2.In view of the aforesaid and following the view taken in that appeal, the present appeal shall stand dismissed.
YASHWANT VARMA, J.
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.MARCH 11, 2024/MJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue