Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17,...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17, Mumbai v. Vanitkumar I. Gupta

High Court 03 Oct 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17, Mumbai v. Vanitkumar I. Gupta
Date of order
03 Oct 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-17, Mumbai v. Vanitkumar I. Gupta, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 2.Accordingly, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. [ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ] [ DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J. ]

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3182 OF 2018 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-17, Mumbai Vs.Vanitkumar I. Gupta .. Appellant .. Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the Appellant.Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent. CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.J. DATE : 3RD OCTOBER, 2022. P.C. : 1.Since the tax effect in the present Appeal is less than Rs.1 crore,Mr. Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellant seeks leave to withdrawthis Appeal in terms of Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 8th August 2019. 2.Accordingly, Appeal is allowed to be withdrawn and dismissed as such.Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules. [ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ] [ DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J. ]
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan