Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1No v. M/S. Talent Steels Industries Ltd
High Court
15 Oct 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1No v. M/S. Talent Steels Industries Ltd
Date of order
15 Oct 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 1No v. M/S. Talent Steels Industries Ltd, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in relying upon the judgment of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
T.C.A.No.625 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 15.10.2024
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R. SURESH KUMARAND
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C. SARAVANAN
T.C.A.No.625 of 2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 1No.63, Race Course RoadCoimbatore...Appellant
Vs.
M/s. Talent Steels Industries Ltd.No.43, Vivekananda NagarRam Nagar, Coimbatore – 641 009PAN: AAB CT 0944 J..Respondent
Prayer: Appeal filed under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the order of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Madras “D”Bench,Chennaidated21.09.2016passedin I.T.A.No.64/Mds/2005.
For the Appellant
:Mr.Karthik RanganathanSenior Standing Counsel
For the Respondent:Mr.G.Baskar
JUDGMENT
(Order of the Court was made by R.SURESH KUMAR, J.)The present tax case appeal was admitted on 28.08.2018 by
this Court on the following substantial questions of law:-
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
"1. Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law, the Tribunal is correct in relying upon the judgment of the jurisdictional High Court in the case of CIT vs. Lovely Exports (P) Ltd. When the cited case is clearly distinguishable from the instant case as the share application money received in the cited case was through banking channels while the payments in the instant case were made in cash with no supporting documents?
2. Whether the ITAT has failed to consider that
the burden of proof lies on the assessee to prove the identity of the creditor, creditworthiness of the applicants and genuineness of the transaction to the satisfaction of the Assessing Officer?"
2. It is submitted by the learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the appellant Revenue that this matter is covered under the Low Tax Effect as per the recent Circular dated 17.09.2024, in Circular No.9/2024.
https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
T.C.A.No.625 of 2018
3. Hence, this appeal stands dismissed, as covered under the low tax effect and the substantial questions of law arising in this appeal are kept open to be decided at the later point of time. There shall be no order as to costs.
(R.S.K., J.) (C.S.N, J) 15.10.2024
Neutral Citation:Yes/No
drm
T.C.A.No.625 of 2018
R. SURESH KUMAR, J.ANDC. SARAVANAN, J.
(drm)
T.C.A.No.625 of 2018
15.10.2024
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.