Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J
High Court
22 Feb 2017 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · phhc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J
Date of order
22 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh v. Ajay Kumar Mittal,J, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
CHANDIGARH
ITA No. 213 of 2016
Date of decision: 22.2.2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Chandigarh
……Appellant
Vs.
Smt. Neena Chaudhary
…..Respondent
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR MITTAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAMENDRA JAIN
Present: Ms. Urvashi Dhugga, Advocate for the appellant.Mr. Jagmohan Bansal, Advocate for the assessee.|
Ajay Kumar Mittal,J.
For orders, see ITA No. 175 of 2016 (The Principal Commissioner of
Income Tax-I, Chandigarh Vs. Sh. Balwinder Singh Bhunder).
(Ajay Kumar Mittal) Judge
February 22, 2017 ‘gs’
(Ramendra Jain) Judge
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue