Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Delhi v. C. J. International Hotels Limited Through

High Court 09 Aug 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Delhi v. C. J. International Hotels Limited Through
Date of order
09 Aug 2019
Assessment year(s)
2001-02
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Delhi v. C. J. International Hotels Limited Through, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: Following the view already expressed by this Court in the above decision, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~31 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 739/2019 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, DELHI ..... Appellant Through: Ms.Vibhooti Malhotra and Mr.Shailendera Singh, Advocates. versus C. J. INTERNATIONAL HOTELS LIMITED Through: ..... Respondent Mr.Mayank Nagi, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE S.MURALIDHAR JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH O R D E R% 09.08.2019 C.M.No.35793/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. C.M. No.35794/2019 (delay) 2. For the reasons explained in the application, the delay of 05 days in filing the appeal is condoned and the application is allowed. ITA 739/2019 3.The Revenue is in appeal against the order dated 18[th] February, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (‘ITAT’) in ITA No.4036/DEL/2016 for the Assessment Year (‘AY’) 2011-12. 4. The issue raised by the Revenue is whether the ITAT erred in deleting the additions made by the Assessing Officer (‘AO’) as a result of charging the annual letting value of the West Tower under the head ‘income from house property’. 5. As noted by the ITAT in the impugned order of this court, the above issue stands decided in favour of the Assessee by this Court for AY 2001-02 in M/s CJ International Hotels Ltd. v Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Delhi (2011) 197 taxman.com 230 (Del). 6. It is pointed out by the Revenue that a Special Leave Petition was filed against the said judgment. However, no order staying the operation of the said judgment has been shown to this Court. 7. Following the view already expressed by this Court in the above decision, this appeal is dismissed. S. MURALIDHAR, J. AUGUST 09, 2019 mr TALWANT SINGH, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan