Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2,...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur v. M/S Rds Construction Company

High Court 01 Apr 2019 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

01 Apr 2019

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur v. M/S Rds Construction Company, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Without recordingseparate reasons, therefore, this Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 / 1 06-ITXA-1727-16.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1727 OF 2016 Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2, Kolhapur.... Appellant versus M/s RDS Construction Company ... Respondent ….... •Mr.N.N. Singh, Advocate for Appellant.•Mr.Rohan Deshpande, Advocate for Respondent. CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 01[st] APRIL, 2019. P.C. : 1. This Appeal is filed by the Revenue to challenge the Judgment passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. 2. It is undisputed position that two questions raised bythe Revenue have been considered earlier by this Court in Income Tax Appeal Nos.1769/16, 1773/16 as well as 1614/16. Thesequestions were not entertained in those Appeals. Without recordingseparate reasons, therefore, this Income Tax Appeal is dismissed. (SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.) (AKIL KURESHI, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.