Case Law › High Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 K...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Kolkata v. Deep Holding Pvt Ltd

High Court 20 May 2025 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · calcutta_original_side

Parties

Date of order

20 May 2025

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 Kolkata v. Deep Holding Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2025) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

od 2 IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION ORIGINAL SIDE RVWO/6/2025 IA NO: GA/1/2025, GA/2/2025 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 KOLKATA VS DEEP HOLDING PVT LTD BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA DATE : 20[th] May, 2025. Appearance :Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Mr.Ankan Das, Adv. Ms. Shradhya Ghosh, Adv. …for appellant. Ms. Pooja Jewrajka, Adv. …for respondent. The Court: - We have heard learned advocates for the parties. There is a delay of 257 days in filing the appeal. As the delay has been properly explained, we condone the delay in filing the appeal. The application, GA/1/2025 is allowed. We have perused the grounds raised in the review application. We find no error apparent on the face of the judgment has been pointed out. Therefore, review jurisdiction cannot be invoked. Accordingly, the review application is dismissed. . (T.S. SIVAGNANAM) CHIEF JUSTICE (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.