Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. M/S. L And T Finance Limited
High Court
15 Dec 2021 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. M/S. L And T Finance Limited
Date of order
15 Dec 2021
Assessment year(s)
2009-10
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. M/S. L And T Finance Limited, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
OD-17
ITAT/133/2019IA No.GA/2/2019IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATAVERSUSM/S. L AND T FINANCE LIMITED
BEFORE :
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE T.S. SIVAGNANAMAnd
THE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA
Date : 15[th] December, 2021
Appearance :-
… For Appellant… For Respondent
The Court : This appeal by the revenue filed under Section 260A ofthe Income Tax, 1961 (the Act, for brevity) is directed against the orderdated 29[th] June, 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “I”Bench, Mumbai in ITA No. 3758/Mum/2014 for the assessment year2009-10.
Mr. Somak Basu, learned Counsel appearing for therespondent/assessee, raised a preliminary objection with regard to the
maintainability of the appeal before this Court by contending that theorder impugned in this appeal has been passed by the Tribunal atMumbai for which this Court does not have territorial jurisdiction.
We have perused the records and we find that the objection raisedby the learned Counsel for the respondent/assessee is sustainable.Therefore, we hold that the appeal is not maintainable before this Court.Consequently, our order dated 17[th] November, 2021 in IA/GA No.2 of2019, which was an application filed for condonation of delay, standsrecalled and the appeal is held to be not maintainable before this Court.
Liberty is given to the appellant/department to file the appealbefore the appropriate Court having jurisdiction over the matter.
Registry is directed to return the original certified copy of the orderpassed by the Tribunal after retaining photostat copy of the same.
Consequently, the application for condonation of delay is alsodismissed as not maintainable.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.