Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. M/S. Subhavani Projects Private Limited
High Court
02 Sep 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. M/S. Subhavani Projects Private Limited
Date of order
02 Sep 2025
Assessment year(s)
2012-13
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2, Kolkata v. M/S. Subhavani Projects Private Limited, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Therefore, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
O-1
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITA/31/2023
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2, KOLKATA VS M/s. SUBHAVANI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED
BEFORE : THE HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE T.S SIVAGNANAM -A N D- HON'BLE JUSTICE CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS) DATE : 2[nd] September, 2025
Mr. Soumen Bhattacharjee, Adv. Mr. Ankan Das, Adv. Ms. Shradhya Ghosh, Adv. …for appellant Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Adv. Mr. Sutirtha Das, Adv. …for respondent
The Court : This appeal has been filed by the revenue under section 260A of the Income tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 5.4.2023 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “B” Bench, Kolkata in ITA No. 2609/Kol/2018 for the assessment year 2012-13.
We have heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties.
It is not in dispute that the tax effect in this appeal is Rs. 1,10,32,251/-, which is below the threshold limit. If that be so, the revenue cannot pursue the matter further on account of the Circular issued by the Central Board of Direct
Tax being Circular No.9 of 2024. Therefore, the appeal stands disposed of on the ground of low tax effect.
The substantial questions of law admitted by order dated 26[th]September, 2023 are left open.
(T.S. SIVAGNANAM, CJ. )
(CHAITALI CHATTERJEE (DAS), J.)
SN/PKD. AR
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.