Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S. The Zigma Technologies (I)(P) Ltd
High Court
02 Nov 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S. The Zigma Technologies (I)(P) Ltd
Date of order
02 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. M/S. The Zigma Technologies (I)(P) Ltd, the High Court (2018) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED: 2.11.2018
CORAM
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESHANDTHE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.KALYANASUNDARAM
Tax Case Appeal No.28 of 2018andC.M.P.No.345 of 2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2No.63, Race Course Road,Coimbatore. AppellantVs.
M/s. The Zigma Technologies (I)(P) Ltd.,No.747, Amar Complex, S.K.C.Road,Erode 638 001. PAN: AAC CT 0611KRespondent
Tax Case Appeal filed under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax AppellateTribunal, Madras 'D' Bench, Chennai, dated 3.4.2017 made inITA No.2722/Mds/2016.For Appellant : Mr.T.R.Senthil Kumar Standing Counsel
J U D G M E N T(Delivered by Huluvadi G.Ramesh,J)
This Tax Case Appeal has been filed by the Revenuecalling in question the correctness of the order passed by theIncome Tax Appellate Tribunal, Madras Madras 'D' Bench,Chennai, dated 3.4.2017 made in ITA No.2722/Mds/2016, byraising the following substantial question of law:
"Whether the Tribunal is correct in following theearlier order in the assessee's own case for theassessment year 2010-11 wherein the entireexpenses were allowed in the fifth year of thecontract and whereas in the present contract,entire expenditure is allowed in the first year
https://hcservices.ecourts.gov.in/hcservices/
itself which is against the principle of Matchingconcept?"
2. When the matter is taken up for admission, the learnedStanding Counsel brought to our notice the Circularinstruction issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes videCircular No.3/2018 dated 11.7.2018 wherein it is stipulatedthat appeals shall not be filed/pursued by the Departmentbefore the High Court in cases where the tax effect does notexceed Rs.50 lakhs.
3. In the instant case, the tax effect is less than themonetary limit imposed and therefore, the appeal is dismissedas not pressed, preserving the substantial question of law fordetermination in an appropriate case. The connectedmiscellaneous petition is closed.
Sd/- Assistant Registrar(CS IX)
//True Copy// Sub Assistant Registrar
sskTo
1. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal,Madras D Bench, Besant Nagar, Chennai.Copy To:
1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax 2 No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore.
2. M/s. The Zigma Technologies (I)(P) Ltd., No.747, Amar Complex, S.K.C.Road, Erode 638 001. PAN: AAC CT 0611K
CSL/30.11.2018
TCA No.28 of 2018
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.