Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Bahubali Shantilal Shah
High Court
27 Nov 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Bahubali Shantilal Shah
Date of order
27 Nov 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax - 2 v. Bahubali Shantilal Shah, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C/TAXAP/462/2016 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 462 of 2016
==========================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - 2VersusBAHUBALI SHANTILAL SHAH
==========================================================Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1NOTICE SERVED(4) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
Date : 27/11/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE HARSHA DEVANI)
1.Ms. Mauna Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the appellant has submitted a note together with a communication dated 29.10.2018 of the Joint Commissioner of Income Tax (Judicial), for Principal Chief Commissioner of Income Tax, Gujarat, Ahmedabad, instructing her to withdraw the appeal as the tax effect is below the monetary limit of Rs.50,00,000/- and the case does not fall in the exceptional clauses as per the CBDT Circular No.3/2018 dated 11.07.2018, reserving a right to revive the appeal in case any discrepancy comes to notice at a later stage after withdrawal of the appeal as human error cannot be ruled out.
2.Permission as prayed for is granted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
(HARSHA DEVANI, J)
Vijay
(A. P. THAKER, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.