Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bank Of India
High Court
09 Apr 2019 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bank Of India
Date of order
09 Apr 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Bank Of India, the High Court (2019) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
1 / 2 10-ITXA-1379-17.odt
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1379 OF 2017
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-2
.... Appellant
versus
Bank of India... Respondent
…....
Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Appellant.Mr.Suresh Kumar, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr.Subhash Shetty, Advocate for Respondent.Mr.Subhash Shetty, Advocate for Respondent.
CORAM : AKIL KURESHI &
SARANG V. KOTWAL, JJ.DATE: 09[th] APRIL, 2019.
P.C. :
1. This Appeal is filed by the revenue to challenge the
judgment of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. Following questionis presented for our consideration;
“Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of thecase and in law, the Hon'ble ITAT was correct in law inholding that the interest portion of the refund issuedearlier has to be ignored for the purpose of calculatinginterest u/s 244A of the Income tax Act, 1961, payable
2 / 2 10-ITXA-1379-17.odt
to the assessee, on refund arising out of the order givingeffect to order of appellate authority?”
2.
Perusal of the impugned judgment of the Tribunalwould show that Tribunal has merely remanded the question of
computation of interest payable to the assessee under section244A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, before the Assessing Officerfor fresh consideration.
3. That being the position, we do not find any question of
law arising. Income Tax Appeal is dismissed.
(SARANG V. KOTWAL, J.)
(AKIL KURESHI, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.