Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-2 v. Connaught Plaza Restaurant Pvt. Ltd

$~3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ ITA 542/2016 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-2 ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Sanjay Kumar and Mr.Dileep Shivpuri, Standing Counsels versus CONNAUGHT PLAZA RESTAURANT PVT. LTD. ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Kavita Jha and Ms.Roopali Gupta, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI O R D E R % 20.09.2016 The revenue’s appeal urges that a substantial question of law arises i.e. whether P.O.S. terminal, is a computer or alternatively falls within the classification of computer peripherals and accessories for the purpose of depreciation. This court notices that for the relevant assessment year i.e. AY 2008-2009 even though the AO held that the equipment was neither computer nor it could be computer accessories, the CIT (A) overturned that decision and held that the assessee was entitled to 60% depreciation. The CIT (A) was of the opinion that the equipment was akin to a computer. That determination has been concurred to the ITAT. Given these circumstances, this court is of the opinion that no question of law, much less a substantial one arises for determination under Section 260A. The appeal is therefore dismissed. S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J SEPTEMBER 20, 2016 rb NAJMI WAZIRI, J