Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Ferromatik Milacron India P Ltd

High Court 24 Jul 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Ferromatik Milacron India P Ltd
Date of order
24 Jul 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Ferromatik Milacron India P Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Under the circumstances, on the aforesaid ground alone, present Tax Appeal is dismissed as not pressed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 509 of 2018 ====================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2 Versus FERROMATIK MILACRON INDIA P LTD ====================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the APPELLANT(s) No. 1MR B S SOPARKAR(6851) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1====================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAHandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE Date : 24/07/2018ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH) As the tax effect involved in the present Tax Appeal is less than Rs.50 lacs, considering the recent Circular issued by the CBDT dated 11/07/2018, being Circular No.3/2018, Mrs Mauna Bhatt, learned Advocate appearing on behalf of the revenue does not press the present Tax Appeal. Under the circumstances, on the aforesaid ground alone, present Tax Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. However, liberty is reserved in favour of the revenue to revive the Appeal by filing a note. (M.R. SHAH, J.) siji (A.Y. KOGJE, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan