Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd
High Court
21 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd
Date of order
21 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Gujarat Lease Financing Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: 1028 of 2018 relateable to the quantum additions.In that view of the matter, this Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 1048 of 2018
=============================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2VersusGUJARAT LEASE FINANCING LTD.
=============================================================
Appearance :Mrs MAUNA M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
=============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA21[st] August 2018
ORAL ORDER(PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income
Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad [“Tribunal” for short] dated 27[th] February 2018, raising the following question for our consideration.
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the penalty under Section 271 [1](c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ?”
Issue pertains to penalty imposed by the Assessing Officer
under Section 271 [1] (c) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. We are
C/TAXAP/1048/2018 ORDER
informed that on quantum additions, the assessee had succeeded. The High Court also has dismissed Revenue’s Tax Appeal No. 1028 of 2018 relateable to the quantum additions.In that view of the matter, this Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Prakash
[Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.