Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Indo Colchem Ltd
High Court
28 Aug 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Indo Colchem Ltd
Date of order
28 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 2 v. Indo Colchem Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: 2.Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.2,24,64,664/- made on account of addition of GP/NP which was based on past year's profit?” 2.The issue pertains to rejection of book reserves and making additions to the gross profit of the assessee, inter-...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1047/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1047 of 2018
==========================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 2VersusINDO COLCHEM LTD
==========================================================Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 28/08/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1.Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 07.03.2018
raising following questions for our consideration:
“1.Whether the Hon'ble ITAT erred in law and on facts by not holding that the AO had correctly rejected the Books of Account u/s 145(3) of the IT Act as he was not satisfied about the correctness or completeness of the accounts of the assessee ?
2.Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.2,24,64,664/- made on account of addition of GP/NP which was based on past year's profit?”
2.The issue pertains to rejection of book reserves
and making additions to the gross profit of the
assessee, inter-alia, on the ground that other
C/TAXAP/1047/2018 ORDER
industries in the same business reflect higher profit. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) partly deleted the addition. In further appeal, the Tribunal made complete deletion, inter-alia, on the ground that the Assessing Officer had ignored the effect of foreign exchange fluctuations.
3.Having heard learned counsel for the Revenue and having perused documents on record, we find that the issue is entirely fact based. The Tribunal has given detailed reasons and referred to the evidence on record. No question of law arises. Tax Appeal is dismissed.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
ANKIT SHAH
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.