Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Kolkata v. Appejay House (P) Ltd. (
High Court
02 Jul 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Kolkata v. Appejay House (P) Ltd. (
Date of order
02 Jul 2024
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3, Kolkata v. Appejay House (P) Ltd. (, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
ITA/55/2021
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA SPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX) ORIGINAL SIDE
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3, KOLKATA
-VERSUS-
APPEJAY HOUSE (P) LTD. (PAN ).
BEFORE : THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR GUPTA Date : 2[nd] July, 2024.
Appearance:Mr. Aryak Dutt, Adv. … for the appellant. Mr. Avra Mazumder, Adv. ..for the respondent.
1.Heard Sri Aryak Dutt, learned standing counsel for the appellant and Sri Avra Mazumder, learned advocate appearing for the respondent/assessee. Mazumder, learned advocate appearing for the respondent/assessee.
2.Both the learned counsel for the parties jointly has drawn attention of this Court that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the monetary limit fixed by Circular No.17/2019. They have jointly referred to the order dated 15.06.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central-I, Kolkata relating to the Assessment Year 2008-09 which appears at page 18 of the stay application. Court that the tax effect involved in the present appeal is below the monetary limit fixed by Circular No.17/2019. They have jointly referred to the order dated 15.06.2012 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), Central-I, Kolkata relating to the Assessment Year 2008-09 which appears at page 18 of the stay application.
As.
3.In view of the aforesaid, the appeal (ITA/55/2021) is dismissed as the tax effect involved is much below the monetary limit fixed for filing of appeal by the income tax department by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019. effect involved is much below the monetary limit fixed for filing of appeal by the income tax department by Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019.
(SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, J.)
(AJAY KUMAR GUPTA, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.