In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. Keshavlal Mangaldas, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Hence, the present appeal stands dismissed as the same is wrongly filed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/726/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABADR/TAX APPEAL NO. 726 of 2018
==========================================================PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3VersusKESHAVLAL MANGALDAS
==========================================================
Appearance:MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAHand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
Date : 02/07/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.R. SHAH)
Mrs.Mauna M.Bhatt, learned advocate on behalf of the Revenue has stated at the Bar that as the cross-objection before the learned Tribunal was rejected/ dismissed by the learned ITAT, the present appeal is wrongly filed. Hence, the present appeal stands dismissed as the same is wrongly filed.
(M.R. SHAH, J)
sunil
(A.Y. KOGJE, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue