Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. M/S N A Export

High Court 09 May 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. M/S N A Export
Date of order
09 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 3 v. M/S N A Export, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: 3.Tax Appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/461/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 461 of 2018 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 3VersusM/S N A EXPORT ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 09/05/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1. Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal dated 29.11.2017 raising following question for our consideration: “Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in upholding the decision of the CIT(A) and thereby deleting the additionmadebytheA.O.of Rs.1,54,69,089/- on account of Low Gross Profit ?” 2.Perusal of the documents on record would show that in case of the respondent-assessee, for the assessment year 2010-11, the Assessing Officer doubted the book reserves. After rejecting the accounts of the assessee, he made additions which, as noticed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) C/TAXAP/461/2018 ORDER and the Tribunal, would bring the gross profit ratio of the business of the assessee at abnormal level. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and the Tribunal gave concurrent reasons why such approach of the Assessing Officer was not justified. Entire issue is fact based, no question of law arises. 3.Tax Appeal is dismissed. (AKIL KURESHI, J) ANKIT SHAH (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan