In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Rasna Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Issue: KARIA Date : 20/08/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.Revenue has filed this appeal presenting following questions for our consideration: “[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance for liabilities for damaged goods of Rs.1...
Decision: 3.Tax Appeal is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1034/2018 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1034 of 2018
==========================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3VersusRASNA PVT. LTD
==========================================================Appearance:
MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA
Date : 20/08/2018
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
1.Revenue has filed this appeal presenting
following questions for our consideration:
“[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance for liabilities for damaged goods of Rs.1,89,45,235/-?
[B]Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of depreciation of Rs.20,43,972/- on intangible assets in the form of non-compete territory rights?
2.This issue pertains to assessment year 2009-10.
Revenue's appeal for the same year raising same
questions being Tax Appeal No.1031 of 2018 is admitted for considering only the second question.
C/TAXAP/1034/2018 ORDER
The first question is declined on merits. It is not necessary to separately admit this appeal since Tax Appeal No.1031 of 2018 confined to one question, is admitted and will be considered finally.
3.Tax Appeal is disposed of.
(AKIL KURESHI, J)
ANKIT SHAH
(B.N. KARIA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.