Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Rasna Pvt. Ltd

High Court 20 Aug 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Rasna Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
20 Aug 2018
Assessment year(s)
2008-09
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-3 v. Rasna Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Issue: KARIA Date : 20/08/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.Revenue has filed this appeal presenting following questions for our consideration: “[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance for liabilities for damaged goods of Rs.4...

Decision: 3.Tax Appeal is disposed of.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/TAXAP/1032/2018 ORDER IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1032 of 2018 ========================================================== PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-3VersusRASNA PVT. LTD ========================================================== Appearance: MRS MAUNA M BHATT(174) for the PETITIONER(s) No. 1 for the RESPONDENT(s) No. 1 ========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIand HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE B.N. KARIA Date : 20/08/2018 ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) 1.Revenue has filed this appeal presenting following questions for our consideration: “[A] Whether the Appellate Tribunal was right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance for liabilities for damaged goods of Rs.4,22,75,321/-? [B]Whether the Appellate Tribunal is right in law and on facts in deleting the disallowance of depreciation of Rs.27,25,296/- on intangible assets in the form of non-compete territory rights? 2.This issue pertains to assessment year 2008-09. Revenue's appeal for the same year raising same questions being Tax Appeal No.1031 of 2018 is admitted for considering only the second question. C/TAXAP/1032/2018 ORDER The first question is declined on merits. It is not necessary to separately admit this appeal since Tax Appeal No.1031 of 2018 confined to one question, is admitted and will be considered finally. 3.Tax Appeal is disposed of. (AKIL KURESHI, J) ANKIT SHAH (B.N. KARIA, J)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan