Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-31, Mumbai v. Jaiprakash L. Singh
High Court
14 Sep 2022 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-31, Mumbai v. Jaiprakash L. Singh
Date of order
14 Sep 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-31, Mumbai v. Jaiprakash L. Singh, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Digitallysigned bySHRADDHASHRADDHAKAMLESHKAMLESHTALEKARTALEKARDate:2022.09.1616:59:17+0530
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 3192 OF 2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-31,Mumbai.. Appellant Vs.Jaiprakash L. SinghPAN : AACPS4994FA.Y. 2007-08.... Respondent****
Ms.Mamta Omle, Advocate for appellant.
Mr.Jitendra Singh, Advocate for respondent.
CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR AND VALMIKI SA MENEZES, JJ.
DATE : 14[th] SEPTEMBER 2022
PC :
1.Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeksleave to withdraw the appeal.
2.Leave, as prayed for, is granted. The appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
3.Refund of court fees, if any, as per Rules.
[VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.] [DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue