Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-33, Mumbai … v. Krishna Tandon …
High Court
19 Dec 2019 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-33, Mumbai … v. Krishna Tandon …
Date of order
19 Dec 2019
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-33, Mumbai … v. Krishna Tandon …, the High Court (2019) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
Urmila IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 826 OF 2019
ININCOME TAX APPEAL ST. NO. 2262 OF 2018
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-33, Mumbai … ApplicantVs.Krishna Tandon … Respondent
… Respondent
Mr.Arvind Pinto for the Applicant.
CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M. S. KARNIK, JJ.
DATE : 19 DECEMBER, 2019.
P. C. :
.Heard learned Counsel for the Applicant.
2.We have perused the affidavit in support of Notice ofMotion. Sufficient cause is made out by the Applicant to condone thedelay in filing the Notice of Motion and for restoration. Delay infiling the Notice of Motion is condoned. Subject to removal of alloffice objections within a period of eight weeks from today, the orderpassed by the Prothonotary & Senior Master dated 1 March 2019 is setaside. Appeal is restored and to come up in regular course. If officeobjections are not removed within eight weeks from today, the earlierorder will stand revived.
1/2
UrmilaDigitally signedby Urmila P.P.IngleDate:2019.12.2018:09:25 +0530Ingle
3.
Notice of Motion is accordingly allowed.
[M. S. KARNIK, J.] [NITIN JAMDAR, J.]
2/2
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue