Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Kolkata v. M/S. Westing House Sexby Farmr Ltd
High Court
03 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Kolkata v. M/S. Westing House Sexby Farmr Ltd
Date of order
03 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-4, Kolkata v. M/S. Westing House Sexby Farmr Ltd, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
OD-15
IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA Special Jurisdiction (Income Tax) ORIGINAL SIDE
ITAT 201 of 2018 IA No.GA 1 of 2018 (Old No. GA 1617 of 2018), GA 2 of 2018(Old No.GA 1618 of 2018)
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-4, KOLKATA VERSUS M/S. WESTING HOUSE SEXBY FARMR LTD.
BEFORE:
The Hon’ble JUSTICE T. S. SIVAGNANAM AND
The Hon’ble JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA Date : 3[rd] January, 2022.
Appearance: Mr. Soumen Bhattacharya, Adv. …for the appellant.
The Court : This appeal filed by the revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Kolkata.
We have heard Mr. Soumen Bhattacharya, learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue.
We are satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition. Accordingly, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. The application being IA No.GA 1 of 2018(Old No.GA 1617 of 2018) for condonation of delay stands allowed.
The learned standing counsel appearing for the appellant/revenue on instructions from the department submitted that the appeal cannot be pursued by the revenue on account of low tax effect.
Recording the said submission, the appeal stands dismissed on the ground of low tax effect.
Consequently, substantial questions of law which have been raised are left open.
The application being IA GA 2 of 2018 (Old No. 1618 of 2018) for stay also stands dismissed.
(T. S. SIVAGNANAM, J.)
(HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
s.pal/pkd
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.