Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Vimalachal Print And Pack Pvt Ltd
High Court
12 Jun 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Vimalachal Print And Pack Pvt Ltd
Date of order
12 Jun 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Vimalachal Print And Pack Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 543 of 2018
==============================================================PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4VersusVIMALACHAL PRINT AND PACK PVT LTD
==============================================================
Appearance :Mrs MAUNA M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER for the RESPONDENT
==============================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA12[th] June 2018
ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Ahmedabad [“Tribunal” for short] dated 22[nd ]November 2017 raising the following question for our consideration :
“Whether the Appellate Tribunal has erred
in law and on facts in setting aside the issue of addition under Section 41[1] to the file of the Assessing Officer ?”
Having perused the order on record with the assistance of learned counsel for the Revenue, we notice that quite apart from the very small amount being involved in this appeal, the Tribunal
merely remanded the proceedings for fresh verification by the Assessing Officer. In the context of cessation of liability under Section 41[1] of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the contention of the assessee was that the liability concerning four different parties was actually written off in the later years and the amount was offered to tax. It was for the purpose of verifying the same, as such the Tribunal placed the issue back before the Assessing Officer There is no reason to interfere with. Tax Appeal is dismissed.
Prakash
[Akil Kureshi, J.][B.N Karia, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.