Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Winners Business Link Pvt Ltd
High Court
19 Mar 2018 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Winners Business Link Pvt Ltd
Date of order
19 Mar 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 4 v. Winners Business Link Pvt Ltd, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Issue: JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI) Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore dated 9[th] August 2017 raising the following questions for our consideration :- [A]“Whether the Tribunal is correct in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs.
Decision: Tax Appeal is dismissed. {Akil Kureshi, J.} Prakash {B.N Karia, J.}
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL No. 178 of 2018
=============================================================
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 4VersusWINNERS BUSINESS LINK PVT LTD
=============================================================
Appearance :Mr M.R BHATT, Sr Advocate with Mrs MAUNA M BHATT, Advocate for the PETITIONER=============================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHIandHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA19[th] March 2018andHONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE B.N. KARIA19[th] March 2018
ORAL ORDER(PER : HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE AKIL KURESHI)
Revenue is in appeal against the judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore dated 9[th] August 2017 raising the following questions for our consideration :-
[A]“Whether the Tribunal is correct in law and on facts in deleting the addition of Rs. 2,65,16,100/= made by the Assessing Officer after rejecting the assessee’s method of accounting ?”
[B]“Whether the Tribunal is correct in law and on facts in upholding the decision of CIT [A] in restricting the disallowance to 5% instead of 10% made by the Assessing Officer under Sectio
37 [1] of the Act ?”
Regarding Question No. 1, counsel for the Revenue pointed out that by an elaborate order passed in Tax Appeal No. 333 of 2017 dated 6[th] June 2017, this Court has turned down the question under similar circumstances. Without recording separate reasons, therefore, this question is not considered.
Regarding 2[nd] question, we notice that the same is based entirely on appreciation of facts on record.
No question of law arises. Tax Appeal is dismissed.
{Akil Kureshi, J.}
Prakash
{B.N Karia, J.}
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.