Case LawHigh Court › Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5,...

Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5, Kolkata v. M/S. Aravali Polymers Llp

High Court 05 Apr 2023 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · calcutta_original_side
Parties
Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5, Kolkata v. M/S. Aravali Polymers Llp
Date of order
05 Apr 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax 5, Kolkata v. M/S. Aravali Polymers Llp, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Decision: Hence, the application is dismissed, consequently, the appeal stands rejected.Substantial questions of law, as suggested, are left open.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTASPECIAL JURISDICTION (INCOME TAX)ORIGINAL SIDE ITAT/53/2023IA NO: GA/1/2023, GA/2/2023 PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX 5, KOLKATAVS.M/S. ARAVALI POLYMERS LLP BEFORE :THE HON’BLE T.S. SIVAGNANAM ACTING CHIEF JUSTICEAndTHE HON’BLE JUSTICE HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYADate : 5[th] April, 2023 Appearance :Mr. Amit Sharma, Adv.…..for appellant The Court : - We have heard Mr. Amit Sharma, learned advocate for theappellant. It appears that the notice, which has been sent to the respondent, has beenrefused to be received. There is a delay of 1497 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the condone delay petition andwe find that sufficient reason has not been shown for not preferring the appeal withinthe period of limitation. Hence, the application is dismissed, consequently, the appeal stands rejected.Substantial questions of law, as suggested, are left open. (T.S. SIVAGNANAM)ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) (HIRANMAY BHATTACHARYYA, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan